Sunday, November 1, 2009

Autobahn


Two weeks ago I sat in a small black box theatre and for two hours watched a play take place in a car. I guess a lot of people would call that boring; there were no big fight scenes, no sex scenes, and no dancing and singing musical numbers. However, this play was incredibly intriguing and thought provoking. Written by Neil Labute, Autobahn is a series of vignettes that give the audience a peek into different kinds of relationships and actions, all taking place within a car. These seven scenes range from a young couple going "parking", to a pedophilic teacher and his young student going on a road trip. What was fantastic about this production and the direction was how the scenarios and the relationships, at first, seem familiar and bland; the scene picks up mid-dialogic conversation, forcing the audience to play catch-up and analyze what is taking place in the scene. However, as the scene progresses, the audience realizes that not everything is as it seems. As the director points out in his notes in the program, "some form of betrayal cries out to be addressed...the destination often holds a potential for violence, violation or the disintegration of a relationship."

There is also an interesting tension that is created by the confines of the car. Each actor is spatially constricted by the car, forcing them to think creatively in respect to their physicality in their acting; furthermore, the characters are restricted by the car and their relationships in that within the climax of the scene, the characters are forced to stay and talk--there is no escaping the inside of the speeding car, which only amplifies the drama and raises the stakes. For each character, the car is simultaneously a prison and a safe-haven, barring themselves in, while also ensuring the presence of their other-half. The characters are also restricted by the confines of language. Each scene is full of misunderstanding as characters struggle to articulate their desires and their fears.

While I loved the production and the directing, my main complaint comes as a consequence from the acting choices that were made. While it could be argued that my problems came from the work of the director, I feel as if the choices that were made were from a lack of preparation and studying by the actors, not as a result of the directing. I feel that it is the job of an actor to present something new to the audience that they would not have been able to discover on their own just by reading the play. It seemed that some of the actors in this production just focused on memorizing their lines and then delivering them in a natural-sounding tone. All of the actors are trained very well technically, that is obvious. However, there seemed to be a lack of commitment in a few of them to do their homework and discover what their characters wanted, what was in their way, and to then discover new tactics to getting their objective. Each scene was, on average, fifteen minutes in length; fifteen minutes can be a long time for an audience member when they are watching an actor do the same thing the whole time. What is brilliant about Neil Labute, and why he is one of my favorite playwrights, is that his writing seems so effortless and natural; however, this can be a trap for actors because an actor could become complacent in just sounding natural and decide to not push or strive for the deeper meaning of the work. In the end, all of the scenarios collide in a car crash, symbolizing the reckless decisions made by the characters that then lead to consequences, fatalities, and injuries when they crash into the lives of the other characters. If some of the actors had done more work, this last scene would have been much more dramatic and impacting. Unfortunately, some of the actors were on cruise control, and couldn't keep up with the racing performance of their cast mates.

2 comments:

  1. This is a show that I had really wanted to see but wasn't able to make it the weekend it was running. Therefore, I really appreciate the depth and attention to detail in your review. I think it's such an interesting concept to construct a play out of all of these vignettes in a car, and I appreciate your deconstruction of the metaphors at work. It's also really cool to read what you've written as a review and the types of things that you notice upon viewing a play as an actor, that I would never think about. For example, the constricting space of the car and how the actors had to move accordingly in a way that still portrayed their specific character's physicality. I never would've thought about that! I also find it incredibly interesting that you can tell who did and didn't do their homework, and it makes me curious as to whether I would have noticed it as well, even without studying theater. I know it's always hard for me when something by a favorite author or director ends up being disappointing, as I would imagine it is for you when seeing a favorite playwright's work in a way that doesn't do it justice. Thanks for the review!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great post. Coming from filmmaking, I always love to read about performances, and especially, actor’s response to certain plays or films. In the film school they don’t teach us for a single second about directing theater or working in theater, so it’s really kind of a fresh art for me. I know so little about it, that I can appreciate a play for the story and characters, and it’s easy to get lost in what’s going on.

    This immersion seems contrary to what you would expect while watching a play that takes place solely in a car, but I think it’s a testament to how talented the people working on the show were that you were so intrigued by it.

    The most interesting part of your post, to me, was…”There is also an interesting tension that is created by the confines of the car. Each actor is spatially constricted by the car, forcing them to think creatively in respect to their physicality in their acting;talk

    Thinking from a director’s standpoint, I could imagine the most difficult part of this scene was thinking of an original and exciting way to block out the action within the confines of the car. I’m sure he was eternally grateful to the actors for thinking about those spatial constrictions and how they could work around them. I’m wondering what kinds of direction he could give to the actors. If you were in the position of these actors what would you want to hear? I personally believe that if you weren’t engaged by the actor’s performance, as you said, a lot of the fault must be placed on the director. It’s his or her’s responsibility to guide the actors to where they need to be for the scenes to play comfortably and naturally.

    Another thing you said that I thought was interesting was… an actor could become complacent in just sounding natural and decide to not push or strive for the deeper meaning of the work.

    What kind of things do you do, as an actor, to get past that eventual complacency? I have no idea how actor’s maintain quality of performance over so many takes and so much repetition, it’s one of the things that truly impresses me.

    I found your post so interesting because I recently started watching French cinema again and I see a lot of similarities between Autobahn and French cinema. Jean-Luc Godard, an infamous French filmmaker, frequently writes and directs scenes that are over 20-minutes long and take place in a single room. His first feature, Breathless, has a 26 minute scene in a bedroom, that is really held together by the strong writing and direction of Godard as well as the performances of the actors. I can imagine him dealing with the same limitations your director had. Fortunately for them, the scene plays well because the actors move from one side of the bed to the other, to the bathroom, to the window, and really take advantage of the geography of the location to keep the scene alive.

    Here is a link to 10-minutes of the bedroom scene…Watch Godard work his magic…

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHQ2Q-_bl8k

    ReplyDelete